91制片厂

What differentiates Miro from other similar products?

Its full of contents - from possible feature using to the sharing of ideia. Besides that, its really the easiest mind/workflow design software that I麓ve ever used.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

The multi sharing with other people from the company and the way we are able to stabilish some rules over who can do what in each board.

What do you dislike most about this product?

The export formats available during free test - the image file quality its very poor.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

You need to have in mind that the product for itself will only help improving ideas and/or MVPs for plans that are already in someones head. Its not a miracle solution for creation of new features, but a improver of idea development and sharing

What differentiates Miro from other similar products?

I began utilizing InVision Studio to allow our development team to easily extract code snippets from components without having to export them to Zeplin. I've been working on improving the navigation on my company's website. It's a fantastic tool for introducing myself and the rest of my team to more in-depth UI/UX development. Good sharing possibilities, and you get three projects for free before you have to pay. It's a big improvement than providing the web team flat wireframes/renders. This may save a lot of time if you obtain input from the development team and stakeholders on a regular basis.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

It has some extremely amazing transition effects (for example, hover versus click interaction). It is really simple to specify where users can click or scroll to reach additional components of the interaction. Another fantastic feature is the ability to animate everything in one go, without the need for many artboards for animation; instead, you have a timeline, much as you would in Adobe Premiere, which is fantastic. Another significant benefit is that the website contains video courses and a Q&A community, and the managers plainly maintain it.

What do you dislike most about this product?

You must add flat pictures to the site, such as your pages and interactions with them. When working on huge interaction designs, having to update pages outside of InVision, remove old pages before reloading, then re-integrate new ones gets laborious. When compared to Sketch, it's not finalized in certain power extensions, but I've imported it back and forth to find this out for myself.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

A fantastic tool for UI/UX design and complicated transitions. It's also beneficial to solicit input and comments from the whole organization or design team, allowing everyone to participate in the process. It's a fantastic environment for learning and practicing UI/UX development and prototyping. It also has a rather short learning curve.

What differentiates Miro from other similar products?

Share prototypes with stakeholders and clients to quickly obtain useful input on new concepts we are developing. We came to understand the need of receiving design feedback swiftly so that we could make modifications and begin development as soon as feasible. Before putting their products on the market, my clients were able to validate their product ideas and enhance their UX thanks to InVision. In essence, it removed the element of risk from product selection.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

It was simple to add components to online surveys because to InVision straightforward emulation of actual apps and straightforward linkages to prototypes. The capability of design prototyping appeals to me. At my firm, we frequently use this application to create prototypes, share them with different stakeholders, get their input, and respond to their inquiries in real time on the prototype. Because Invision is so user-friendly, any department can rapidly understand a new design and provide input. I appreciate that the prototypes are clickable, much like a real product would be.

What do you dislike most about this product?

I can't really think of anything I don't like about it, though perhaps if I was more engaged in prototyping I might. However, I just use Invision in my present position to review design prototypes and offer input; for this use case, it works well.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

Although InVision is a highly complete prototype tool, you need also take alternative options like Axure into consideration to make sure they match your demands. I advise you to utilize this tool for all design prototypes and to send the prototypes to potential customers and interested parties for feedback.